languatron
Home Help Search Login Register
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
December 18, 2005, 12:18:17 AM

Login with username, password and session length
689 Posts in 462 Topics by 1 Members
Latest Member: languatron
THE TRACK RECORD OF UNIVERSAL STUDIOS/SCI-FI CHANNEL......"JOHN EDWARD" CANCELLED....."THE CHRONICLE" CANCELLED......"FARSCAPE" CANCELLED....."TREMORS" CANCELLED......"DREAM TEAM" CANCELLED...."SECRET ADVENTURES OF JULES VERNE" CANCELLED....."BLACK SCORPION" CANCELLED....."SCIOGRAPHY" CANCELLED....."SCI-FI VORTEX" CANCELLED....."INVISIBLE MAN" CANCELLED....."G VS. E" CANCELLED....."WILLIAM SHATNER'S FULL MOON FRIGHT NIGHT" CANCELLED...."FIRST WAVE" CANCELLED....."FTL NEWSFEED" CANCELLED....."NEW OUTER LIMITS" CANCELLED......"POLTERGIEST-THE LEGACY" CANCELLED....."TOTAL RECALL-2070" CANCELLED......"THE WAR ROOM" CANCELLED......"SCI-FI BUZZ" CANCELLED......"TRIPPING THE RIFT" CANCELLED......"SLIDERS" CANCELLED....."WEEKLY SCI-FI NEWS WITH CHASE MASTERSON" CANCELLED...."MYSTERY SCIENCE THEATER 3000" CANCELLED....."VR-5" CANCELLED........"TIME TRAX" CANCELLED......."THE FLASH" CANCELLED......"NOW & AGAIN" CANCELLED......"M.A.N.T.I.S." CANCELLED......."FANTASY ISLAND" CANCELLED......"TIME COP" CANCELLED........"SPACE PRECINCT" CANCELLED......."MAX HEADROOM" CANCELLED......."THE MAGICIAN" CANCELLED....."SIX MILLION DOLLAR MAN" CANCELLED........"BIONIC WOMAN" CANCELLED......"HULK" CANCELLED......"SWAMP THING" CANCELLED......"WONDER WOMAN" CANCELLED......"THE IMMORTAL" CANCELLED......"VIPER" CANCELLED......"RONALD D. MOORE'S TREKKIE STAR: GALACTICA" CANCELLED (??)........CANCELLATIONS INCLUDE SCI-FI CHANNEL ORIGINAL PROGRAMMING AND SYNDICATED SERIES SHOWN ON SCI-FI CHANNEL...."RONALD D. MOORE'S TREKKIE STAR: GALACTICA" HAS NOT BEEN CANCELLED YET.....

"VAN HELSING" FAILS AT BOX OFFICE...."THE HULK" FAILS AT BOX OFFICE...."CAT IN THE HAT" FAILS AT BOX OFFICE...."JOSEY & THE PUSSYCATS" FAILS AT BOX OFFICE...."FLINTSONES" FAILS AT BOX OFFICE....."VIVA: ROCK VEGAS" FAILS AT BOX OFFICE...."ROCKY & BULLWINKLE" FAILS AT BOX OFFICE...."HOWARD THE DUCK" FAILS AT BOX OFFICE....."PITCH BLACK" FAILS AT BOX OFFICE....."CHRONICLES OF RIDDICK" FAILS AT BOX OFFICE....."VIRUS" FAILS AT BOX OFFICE.....

WHEN UNIVERSAL STUDIOS CANCELLED ALL OF THE SCIENCE FICTION PROGRAMS ON "SCI-FI CHANNEL" AND REPLACED THEM WITH NON-SCIENCE FICTION PROGRAMMING, THEY NEGLECTED TO CHANGE THE NAME OF THE NETWORK TO SOMETHING MORE FITTING. "THE HORROR CHANNEL", "THE USA NETWORK FILM VAULT CHANNEL", "THE INFOMERCIAL NETWORK", "THE HORROR/ACTION CHANNEL", OR "THE COMMERCIAL BROADCAST NETWORK" WOULD HAVE BEEN MORE APPROPRIATE TITLES.

UNIVERSAL STUDIOS TRACK RECORD WITH FANTASY MOVIES ISN'T MUCH BETTER. UNIVERSAL STUDIOS USUALLY RUNS INTO PROBLEMS WHEN THEY TRY TO MAKE LIVE ACTION MOVIES BASED ON COMIC BOOK CHARACTERS. THE "HULK" BORED AUDIENCES TO DEATH BARELY 10 MINUTES INTO THE MOVIE.....TURNING "VAN HELSING" INTO A SUPERNATURAL "RAMBO" WAS TOO RIDICULOUS FOR WORDS....."CAT IN THE HAT" PROVED THAT 5 YEAR OLD KIDS WEREN'T READY FOR "SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE" HUMOR......"JOSEY AND THE PUSSYCATS" WAS NOTHING MORE THAN A "CHARLIE'S ANGELS" RETREAD BASED ON A 1970 CARTOON THAT NO ONE REMEMBERED......THE "FLINTSTONES" MOVIES PROVED THAT REBUILDING "BEDROCK" ON A STUDIO BACKLOT WASN'T ENOUGH TO DRAW IN THE FANS OF THE CARTOON.....SOME PROPERTIES SHOULD BE LEFT IN CARTOON FORM, WHICH "ROCKY & BULLWINKLE" PROVED......"HOWARD THE DUCK" WAS GEORGE LUCAS'S FIRST CAREER FLOP. HOW FITTING THAT LUCAS CHOSE UNIVERSAL STUDIOS FOR THAT MOMENTOUS OCCASION......"PITCH BLACK" WAS "PITCH DULL"....."CHRONICLES OF RIDDICK" DISAPPEARED FROM THEATERS FASTER THAN "FINAL FANTASY-THE SPIRITS WITHIN"......AND "VIRUS" PROVED THAT WHEN UNIVERSAL STUDIOS MADE A MOVIE FOR THE SUMMER OF 1999, NO ONE CAME AND WENT TO THE BEACH INSTEAD......

THE MANAGEMENT OF "UNIVERSAL STUDIOS/SCI-FI CHANNEL" IS AN OPENLY HOSTILE REGIME TOWARDS THE VIEWING PUBLIC, SCIENCE FICTION PROGRAMMING, AND THE "BATTLESTAR GALACTICA" COPYRIGHT. THE ENDLESS GRAVEYARD OF CANCELLED TELEVISION SHOWS ON "SCI-FI CHANNEL" AS WELL AS UNIVERSAL STUDIOS ENDLESS BOX OFFICE FAILURES INDICATES THAT THIS IS A CORPORATION THAT DELIBERATELY LOST ITS WAY IN MAKING RATIONAL BUSINESS DECISIONS. ONE CAN ALWAYS HOPE FOR MIRACLES, AND THE PERMANENT FINANCIAL DOWNFALL OF "UNIVERSAL STUDIOS/SCI-FI CHANNEL" IS A DREAM SHARED BY MANY.
+  languatron
|-+  Languatron's Fun Board - Your On-Line Demonstration Of Mind Over Matter: I Don't Mind, And Bonnie Hammer Doesn't Matter
| |-+  The Ronald D. Moore Criticism Section (Moderator: languatron)
| | |-+  Would I Want Ronald D. Moore Doing A Continuation?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Would I Want Ronald D. Moore Doing A Continuation?  (Read 48 times)
languatron
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 689


Life could be this beautiful without NBC-TV in it.


View Profile Email
Would I Want Ronald D. Moore Doing A Continuation?
« on: January 01, 2005, 03:09:46 PM »

The question was put forward at www.Cylon.org, "Would you as a fan want Ronald D. Moore doing a Galactica continuation if his current "Crap Fest" production ended?" My question is: "Why is this question even be asked?" Is there trouble in "Trekkie Star: Galactica" paradise? Did someone catch wind of Ron Moore's "CRAP FEST" being put out of its misery even before it reaches its airdate on Sci-Fi Channel? Is "Trekkie Star: Galactica" going to be BLESSED with a CANCELLATION ORDER? If it happens, I'll be getting my Christmas 2005 present EARLY THIS YEAR!!

More to the point about "Moore", would I want this guy tackling a continuation of the "REAL 1978 GALACTICA SERIES?" HELL NO!! Not after he revealed his CONTEMPT & HATRED for the "REAL 1978 GALACTICA SERIES." Not after he created a "STAR TREK SEQUEL SERIES" and attached the "Battlestar Galactica" brand name to it. Not after he has been on the Universal payroll all of this time and revealed himself to be even more of an ASSHOLE than the Universal executives themselves.

Some posters on www.Cylon.org stated that they wouldn't mind Ron Moore being on a continuation production, just as long as he wasn't in charge. That if Ron Moore was just a "Hired Hand Scriptwriter" on a continuation, they could accept that. I CAN'T.

   
          I WOULDN'T WANT RONALD D. MOORE ANYWHERE NEAR A CONTINUATION PRODUCTION, NOT EVEN AS A
          CATERER OR EVEN AS A "PORT-A-POTTY" DELIVERY DRIVER.

Ronald D. Moore has proven (AMONG OTHER THINGS), that the VAST COLONIAL UNIVERSE of "Battlestar Galactica" is TOO MONUMENTAL for him to deal with both as a writer and as a producer. He PROVED this when he took this MONUMENTAL UNIVERSE in the 1978 series, and SCALED IT DOWN TO A "STAR TREK" STAGE PLAY. Something psychologically comfortable his LIMITED IMAGINATION COULD DEAL WITH.
It was even the "Little Things" in the "REAL 1978 GALACTICA SERIES" that Ronald D. Moore found INCAPABLE of dealing with as writer. Personally, I LOVED the "Ovions" in the pilot episode of "Galactica." They were CREEPY, FUN, UNIQUE, and hell;.......YOU EVEN HAD TO HAVE A HAND HELD VERSION OF ME TO COMMUNICATE WITH THEM!! Ron Moore COULDN'T DEAL WITH THE "OVIONS" AS A WRITER, SO HE GOT RID OF THEM. This is the mark of a writer WITH NO IMAGINATION. An amphibious race called the "Hessaris" were being subjugated by the Cylons, RON MOORE AVOIDED THIS TOO. Ron Moore got rid of "Athena." WHY?Huh? He got rid of Cassiopia? WHY?Huh? Ron Moore turned "Starbuck" into an "Ellen DeGeneres Lesbo." WHY?Huh? He lopped off Boomer's "Twig & Berries" also. WHY?Huh? The other things that I think are SIMPLE to deal with as a writer, but Ron Moore COULDN't HANDLE, he also got rid of:

1) The "Imperious Leader."
2) "Count Iblis."
3) Queen Lotay (Head Ovion)
4) The "Android Sisters."
5) "Muffit - The Dagget"
6) The "Cylons" -(Sorry, some NYMPHO in a red cocktail dress IS NOT A "CYLON")
7) Bojay
Cool Sheba

How about the COOL HARDWARE from the "REAL 1978 GALACTICA SERIES" that Ron Moore just tossed aside as if they weren't iconic designs?

1) The legendary design of the "Battlestar Galactica" herself?
2) The "Landrams?"
3) The "Power Sleds?"
4) The "Cylon Basestars?"
5) The "Laser Guns?"
6) The "Languatrons?"
7) The "Laser Boles?"
Cool The "Galactica Bridge Set" (Core Command)?


I can't even see Ronald D. Moore writing a "Spec Script" for a "Galactica" continuation production. Even with a simple assignment like this, we get into the EXACT SAME PROBLEMS that PLAGUE Ronald D. Moore as a writer. Professionally, he was trained and interned as a "STAR TREK WRITER." In the process, "BATTLESTAR GALACTICA NEVER GOT REVIVED." I don't care what the ARMY of Universal executives/Ron Moore fans say or claim:

                             NOT ONE RECOGNIZABLE ELEMENT OF WHAT WE KNOW TO BE "BATTLESTAR GALACTICA"
                             SHOWED UP IN RON MOORE'S PRODUCTION.

                                             WE GOT ALOT OF WARMED OVER "STAR TREK CRAP" INSTEAD.

Some of these UNIVERSAL EXECUTIVE/RON MOORE FANS have claimed that Moore's production is not "Star Trek" because it is alot darker than "Star Trek." I guess these UNIVERSAL EXECUTIVE/RON MOORE FANS  missed the Ron Moore interview where he BLATANTLY ADMITTED that he wanted to do a "DARKER VERSION OF STAR TREK: DEEP SPACE NINE."  As time goes on, these same UNIVERSAL EXECUTIVE/RON MOORE FANS are IGNORING the fact that Moore is GRADUALLY ADMITTING MORE AND MORE of how "STAR TREK INSPIRED HIS PRODUCTION."

                                                  SOMETHING THAT I HAVE BEEN SAYING SINCE DAY ONE.

SOMEWHERE ALONG THE WAY DURING THE GENESIS OF THIS "RON MOORE WRITTEN/SKY ONE FINANCED PIECE OF SHIT,"
                                                     " BATTLESTAR GALACTICA" NEVER GOT REVIVED.




DO I WANT RON MOORE NEAR A CONTINUATION PRODUCTION OF "BATTLESTAR GALACTICA?" SINCE HE DOESN'T KNOW WHAT THE HELL "BATTLESTAR GALACTICA" IS:

                                                                       HELL, NO  Kiss

                                                                              Roll Eyes


« Last Edit: January 01, 2005, 03:33:52 PM by languatron » Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to: