Pages: [1]
|
 |
|
Author
|
Topic: Is TV Guide Saving Your Show, Ronny Boy? (Read 70 times)
|
languatron
Moderator
Hero Member
    
Posts: 689

Life could be this beautiful without NBC-TV in it.
|
Well, I suppose they gave it their best shot, didn't they? There was nothing in the TV Guide article to generate interest or excitement for those viewers who have never seen your CRAP FEST before. Of course, how could an article in TV Guide make a BORING and POORLY made television show appear exciting? They TRIED, I'll give them that, Ronny boy. I'll even give TV Guide credit for reiterating the SAME LIES about your show that www.Scifi.com/Scifiwire has been saying all along.
How much longer are you going to keep up this fantasy, Ronny boy? You've got TV Guide kising your butt and keeping up the "official publicity" that should have ended a year ago. Professionally, you can't survive without your ARMY of Universal executives on various bulletin boards PRETENDING TO BE YOUR FANS.
Matt Roush of TV Guide can only praise your show for so long, Ronny boy. He has praised shows a hell of alot better produced and written than your show in the past, and those shows ended up getting cancelled. Your show is existing on left over FUMES, Ronny boy. Left over fumes from the "Official Publicity" way past its welcome, left over fumes from your "Universal Executive Posse" on-line burning themselves out and OVERSTAYING THEIR WELCOME, and left over fumes from the less than stellar ratings performance for your show.
People are sick of your show, Ronny boy. Not from watching it (who's watching it?), but from having it RAMMED DOWN THEIR THROATS in TV Guide and on the Internet. The general public (not affiliated with the POLITICAL AGENDAS of Universal Studios/Sci-Fi Channel), see your show for what it really is. A CRAPPER of the highest magnitude that REFUSES TO GO AWAY even after CRASHING & BURNING in the ratings week after week. Your show STINKS, Ronny boy. Thrown together by a FORMER "Star Trek" staff writer who can't take a HINT and GET THE HELL out of television. You have brought NOTHING NEW to television viewers, Science Fiction, and you certainly HAVEN'T UTILIZED THE TRUE MEANING of the "Battlestar Galactica" brand name.
Let me tell you something, Ronny boy. Your CRAPPY ASS TV show is "CANCELLATION FODDER" that is just sort of "hanging around" the ariwaves for NO CONSTRUCTIVE REASON passing the time away because NO ONE at Universal/Sci-Fi Channel has the BALLS to put your show OUT OF ITS MISERY, and CANCEL IT. Lets be honest here, Ronny boy. Your show is indeed, "just hanging around the ariwaves" way past its CANCELLATION TIME. You're STILL LOOKING FOR VIEWERS, Ronny boy. This is NOT how the television industry works. A new show is let out of the gate, and if it doesn't find viewers based on the hard evidence of the RATINGS, the show gets SHIT-CANNED after a few episodes. Sci-Fi Channel renewed your show, for what? For what it will hopefully do in its second season YET FAILED TO DO in its first? FIND VIEWERS?
Where does TV Guide figure into all of this, Ronny boy? TV Guide is helping you to try and viewers, aren't they? Your TV show is plugged into every known source of LIFE SUPPORT known to man, Ronny boy. TV Guide, on-line marketers, Universal executives PRETENDING to be your fans. What's next, Ronny boy? Sending marketers to schools across the country and backing students into a corner and threatening them into watching your show? Universal/Sci-Fi Channel already did this in SHOPPING MALLS across the country. So, Universal going to schools across the country is not far-fetched, is it?
Maybe if you had made an effort to CONTINUE "Battlestar Galactica" instead of REMAKING "Star Trek", your show would have gone over better with the public, Ronny boy. If original ideas are the bright center of the universe, Ronny boy; your TV show is at the point farthest from. 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
languatron
Moderator
Hero Member
    
Posts: 689

Life could be this beautiful without NBC-TV in it.
|
I think TV Guide is all "Moore-oned" out.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
|
|
|
|