languatron
Home Help Search Login Register
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
December 18, 2005, 12:07:01 AM

Login with username, password and session length
689 Posts in 462 Topics by 1 Members
Latest Member: languatron
THE TRACK RECORD OF UNIVERSAL STUDIOS/SCI-FI CHANNEL......"JOHN EDWARD" CANCELLED....."THE CHRONICLE" CANCELLED......"FARSCAPE" CANCELLED....."TREMORS" CANCELLED......"DREAM TEAM" CANCELLED...."SECRET ADVENTURES OF JULES VERNE" CANCELLED....."BLACK SCORPION" CANCELLED....."SCIOGRAPHY" CANCELLED....."SCI-FI VORTEX" CANCELLED....."INVISIBLE MAN" CANCELLED....."G VS. E" CANCELLED....."WILLIAM SHATNER'S FULL MOON FRIGHT NIGHT" CANCELLED...."FIRST WAVE" CANCELLED....."FTL NEWSFEED" CANCELLED....."NEW OUTER LIMITS" CANCELLED......"POLTERGIEST-THE LEGACY" CANCELLED....."TOTAL RECALL-2070" CANCELLED......"THE WAR ROOM" CANCELLED......"SCI-FI BUZZ" CANCELLED......"TRIPPING THE RIFT" CANCELLED......"SLIDERS" CANCELLED....."WEEKLY SCI-FI NEWS WITH CHASE MASTERSON" CANCELLED...."MYSTERY SCIENCE THEATER 3000" CANCELLED....."VR-5" CANCELLED........"TIME TRAX" CANCELLED......."THE FLASH" CANCELLED......"NOW & AGAIN" CANCELLED......"M.A.N.T.I.S." CANCELLED......."FANTASY ISLAND" CANCELLED......"TIME COP" CANCELLED........"SPACE PRECINCT" CANCELLED......."MAX HEADROOM" CANCELLED......."THE MAGICIAN" CANCELLED....."SIX MILLION DOLLAR MAN" CANCELLED........"BIONIC WOMAN" CANCELLED......"HULK" CANCELLED......"SWAMP THING" CANCELLED......"WONDER WOMAN" CANCELLED......"THE IMMORTAL" CANCELLED......"VIPER" CANCELLED......"RONALD D. MOORE'S TREKKIE STAR: GALACTICA" CANCELLED (??)........CANCELLATIONS INCLUDE SCI-FI CHANNEL ORIGINAL PROGRAMMING AND SYNDICATED SERIES SHOWN ON SCI-FI CHANNEL...."RONALD D. MOORE'S TREKKIE STAR: GALACTICA" HAS NOT BEEN CANCELLED YET.....

"VAN HELSING" FAILS AT BOX OFFICE...."THE HULK" FAILS AT BOX OFFICE...."CAT IN THE HAT" FAILS AT BOX OFFICE...."JOSEY & THE PUSSYCATS" FAILS AT BOX OFFICE...."FLINTSONES" FAILS AT BOX OFFICE....."VIVA: ROCK VEGAS" FAILS AT BOX OFFICE...."ROCKY & BULLWINKLE" FAILS AT BOX OFFICE...."HOWARD THE DUCK" FAILS AT BOX OFFICE....."PITCH BLACK" FAILS AT BOX OFFICE....."CHRONICLES OF RIDDICK" FAILS AT BOX OFFICE....."VIRUS" FAILS AT BOX OFFICE.....

WHEN UNIVERSAL STUDIOS CANCELLED ALL OF THE SCIENCE FICTION PROGRAMS ON "SCI-FI CHANNEL" AND REPLACED THEM WITH NON-SCIENCE FICTION PROGRAMMING, THEY NEGLECTED TO CHANGE THE NAME OF THE NETWORK TO SOMETHING MORE FITTING. "THE HORROR CHANNEL", "THE USA NETWORK FILM VAULT CHANNEL", "THE INFOMERCIAL NETWORK", "THE HORROR/ACTION CHANNEL", OR "THE COMMERCIAL BROADCAST NETWORK" WOULD HAVE BEEN MORE APPROPRIATE TITLES.

UNIVERSAL STUDIOS TRACK RECORD WITH FANTASY MOVIES ISN'T MUCH BETTER. UNIVERSAL STUDIOS USUALLY RUNS INTO PROBLEMS WHEN THEY TRY TO MAKE LIVE ACTION MOVIES BASED ON COMIC BOOK CHARACTERS. THE "HULK" BORED AUDIENCES TO DEATH BARELY 10 MINUTES INTO THE MOVIE.....TURNING "VAN HELSING" INTO A SUPERNATURAL "RAMBO" WAS TOO RIDICULOUS FOR WORDS....."CAT IN THE HAT" PROVED THAT 5 YEAR OLD KIDS WEREN'T READY FOR "SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE" HUMOR......"JOSEY AND THE PUSSYCATS" WAS NOTHING MORE THAN A "CHARLIE'S ANGELS" RETREAD BASED ON A 1970 CARTOON THAT NO ONE REMEMBERED......THE "FLINTSTONES" MOVIES PROVED THAT REBUILDING "BEDROCK" ON A STUDIO BACKLOT WASN'T ENOUGH TO DRAW IN THE FANS OF THE CARTOON.....SOME PROPERTIES SHOULD BE LEFT IN CARTOON FORM, WHICH "ROCKY & BULLWINKLE" PROVED......"HOWARD THE DUCK" WAS GEORGE LUCAS'S FIRST CAREER FLOP. HOW FITTING THAT LUCAS CHOSE UNIVERSAL STUDIOS FOR THAT MOMENTOUS OCCASION......"PITCH BLACK" WAS "PITCH DULL"....."CHRONICLES OF RIDDICK" DISAPPEARED FROM THEATERS FASTER THAN "FINAL FANTASY-THE SPIRITS WITHIN"......AND "VIRUS" PROVED THAT WHEN UNIVERSAL STUDIOS MADE A MOVIE FOR THE SUMMER OF 1999, NO ONE CAME AND WENT TO THE BEACH INSTEAD......

THE MANAGEMENT OF "UNIVERSAL STUDIOS/SCI-FI CHANNEL" IS AN OPENLY HOSTILE REGIME TOWARDS THE VIEWING PUBLIC, SCIENCE FICTION PROGRAMMING, AND THE "BATTLESTAR GALACTICA" COPYRIGHT. THE ENDLESS GRAVEYARD OF CANCELLED TELEVISION SHOWS ON "SCI-FI CHANNEL" AS WELL AS UNIVERSAL STUDIOS ENDLESS BOX OFFICE FAILURES INDICATES THAT THIS IS A CORPORATION THAT DELIBERATELY LOST ITS WAY IN MAKING RATIONAL BUSINESS DECISIONS. ONE CAN ALWAYS HOPE FOR MIRACLES, AND THE PERMANENT FINANCIAL DOWNFALL OF "UNIVERSAL STUDIOS/SCI-FI CHANNEL" IS A DREAM SHARED BY MANY.
+  languatron
|-+  Languatron's Fun Board - Your On-Line Demonstration Of Mind Over Matter: I Don't Mind, And Bonnie Hammer Doesn't Matter
| |-+  The Ron Moore Production Crew Criticism Section
| | |-+  Never Has A Production Crew Demonstrated Such Deficiencies In Imagination
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Never Has A Production Crew Demonstrated Such Deficiencies In Imagination  (Read 191 times)
languatron
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 689


Life could be this beautiful without NBC-TV in it.


View Profile Email
Never Has A Production Crew Demonstrated Such Deficiencies In Imagination
« on: November 05, 2004, 02:46:30 PM »

One of the fun things about looking forward to a new Science Fiction movie or tv show, is seeing the imagination demostrated in production design, art direction, costume design, spaceships, laser guns, creatures, etc. This imagination combined with visual credibility first took root in 1966 with Gene Roddenberry's "Star Trek" series. At the time it premiered, the visual look of "Star Trek" was state of the art "outer space." You had a convincing "Bridge" set with flashing lights. Hell, Mr. Sulu even had a nifty little, motorized view finder that popped up out of his console everytime "Red Alert" was sounded. (Showcased in the episode "Friday's Child"). With the limited budget they had, the 1966 "Star Trek" production crew led by Matt Jeffries built a credible Starship inside and out showcased with IMAGINATIVE set design, spacecraft designs, phaser weapons, etc. Perhaps most importantly, the 1966 "Star Trek" series had a totally UNIQUE, ORIGINAL, DISTINCTIVE, and VISUAL LOOK to it.

Imagination in outer space productions went light years beyond "Star Trek" with the 1968 movie "2001: A Space Odyssey." Again, we had a totally UNIQUE, ORIGINAL, IMAGINATIVE, and DISTINCTIVE look in this movie. The concept of minute detailing of models was introduced in this movie, giving the illusion of great size to spacecraft models never seen before. As in "Star Trek", the production crew of "2001: A Space Odyssey" had such imaginations, that their designs from spaceships to spacecraft interiors became a part of our pop culture.

IMAGINATION CONTINUED with the premiere of "Space: 1999" in 1975. Though "Space: 1999" was accused of being a "Star Trek" clone and having ridiculous scripts, the IMAGINATION DEMONSTRATED in art direction, production design, spacecraft design, and props shows that once again, a production crew came together endowed with the most UNBELIEVABLE IMAGINATIONS demonstrated since "2001: A Space Odyssey."

George Lucas took the credible intergalactic looks of "2001: A Space Odyssey" and "Space: 1999", turned outer space into a loud, flashy amusement park; and made spaceships hot rods in "Star Wars." Whatever criticisms may be directed at George Lucas lately, are irrelevant when discussing "Star Wars." At the time he made "Star Wars" in the mid-1970's, George Lucas had the most uninhibited IMAGINATION ever seen in cinema. When viewing the opening scene of "Star Wars" for the first time in 1977, audiences were seeing what they had always hoped they would see in cinema. An issue of "Amazing Fantasy" magazine come to life with the technology to do it. The production design, art direction, set design, spaceships, and props (LASER SWORDS)!! indicated that the PRODUCTION CREW of "Star Wars" led by George Lucas were blessed with the types of IMAGINATIONS necessary for outer space movies.

This type of IMAGINATION was manifested AGAIN in the 1978 "Battlestar Galactica" series. "The "Galactica" crew caught lightning in a bottle a second time around (right after "Star Wars") with SPACECRAFT DESIGNS and overall production design that was just as IMAGINATIVE and BRILLIANT as "Star Wars."

Ending this discussion on a SAD NOTE, Ronald D. Moore's 2004 television production called "Battlestar Galactica" is neither a worthy heir to the "1978 Battlestar Galactica" series, nor does it build upon the PROUD visual legacy of the productions I have discussed. THERE IS NOT ONE ORIGINAL, BRILLIANT IDEA IN THIS ENTIRE PRODUCTION. It is a LOW BUDGET, ANTI-IMAGINATIVE HODGE PODGE of SCRAPS & PIECES from a thousand Science Fiction productions that have come before. Every individual production department associated with this tv series SUFFERED FROM THE SAME LACK OF IMAGINATION:

1) Art Direction - NO IMAGINATION
2) Production Design - NO IMAGINATION
3) Costume Design - NO IMAGINATION
4) Spacecraft Design - NO IMAGINATION
5) Musical Score - NO IMAGINATION
6) Characters - NO IMAGINATION
7) Format - NO IMAGINATION

Ronald D. Moore RAMMED his production into existence, without thinking about the IMAGINATION REQUIREMENTS NECESSARY to bring such a production to life. For the first time in television history, a Science Fiction television series DOES NOT HAVE A DISTINCTIVE, IMAGINATIVE, UNIQUE, and ORIGINAL look to it. And Ronald D. Moore will have this SAD FACT HANGING OVER HIS HEAD for the rest of his PATHETIC CAREER. The visual look of Ron Moore's "Trekkie Star: Galactica" series ironically matches his style of scriptwriting:

1) Boring
2) Lethargic
3) NO FRESH IDEAS
4) DERIVATIVE
5) INSTANTLY FORGETTABLE

Ronald D. Moore and the production crew who worked on his series HAVE NOTHING TO BE PROUD OF IN THEIR WORK. Their work is INSTANTLY FORGETTABLE.
Logged
languatron
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 689


Life could be this beautiful without NBC-TV in it.


View Profile Email
Re: Never Has A Production Crew Demonstrated Such Deficiencies In Imagination
« Reply #1 on: February 11, 2005, 05:34:24 PM »

Yeah, some of my older posts still pack a punch, huh?  Kiss


                                                                             Roll Eyes
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to: