languatron
Home Help Search Login Register
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
December 18, 2005, 12:18:25 AM

Login with username, password and session length
689 Posts in 462 Topics by 1 Members
Latest Member: languatron
THE TRACK RECORD OF UNIVERSAL STUDIOS/SCI-FI CHANNEL......"JOHN EDWARD" CANCELLED....."THE CHRONICLE" CANCELLED......"FARSCAPE" CANCELLED....."TREMORS" CANCELLED......"DREAM TEAM" CANCELLED...."SECRET ADVENTURES OF JULES VERNE" CANCELLED....."BLACK SCORPION" CANCELLED....."SCIOGRAPHY" CANCELLED....."SCI-FI VORTEX" CANCELLED....."INVISIBLE MAN" CANCELLED....."G VS. E" CANCELLED....."WILLIAM SHATNER'S FULL MOON FRIGHT NIGHT" CANCELLED...."FIRST WAVE" CANCELLED....."FTL NEWSFEED" CANCELLED....."NEW OUTER LIMITS" CANCELLED......"POLTERGIEST-THE LEGACY" CANCELLED....."TOTAL RECALL-2070" CANCELLED......"THE WAR ROOM" CANCELLED......"SCI-FI BUZZ" CANCELLED......"TRIPPING THE RIFT" CANCELLED......"SLIDERS" CANCELLED....."WEEKLY SCI-FI NEWS WITH CHASE MASTERSON" CANCELLED...."MYSTERY SCIENCE THEATER 3000" CANCELLED....."VR-5" CANCELLED........"TIME TRAX" CANCELLED......."THE FLASH" CANCELLED......"NOW & AGAIN" CANCELLED......"M.A.N.T.I.S." CANCELLED......."FANTASY ISLAND" CANCELLED......"TIME COP" CANCELLED........"SPACE PRECINCT" CANCELLED......."MAX HEADROOM" CANCELLED......."THE MAGICIAN" CANCELLED....."SIX MILLION DOLLAR MAN" CANCELLED........"BIONIC WOMAN" CANCELLED......"HULK" CANCELLED......"SWAMP THING" CANCELLED......"WONDER WOMAN" CANCELLED......"THE IMMORTAL" CANCELLED......"VIPER" CANCELLED......"RONALD D. MOORE'S TREKKIE STAR: GALACTICA" CANCELLED (??)........CANCELLATIONS INCLUDE SCI-FI CHANNEL ORIGINAL PROGRAMMING AND SYNDICATED SERIES SHOWN ON SCI-FI CHANNEL...."RONALD D. MOORE'S TREKKIE STAR: GALACTICA" HAS NOT BEEN CANCELLED YET.....

"VAN HELSING" FAILS AT BOX OFFICE...."THE HULK" FAILS AT BOX OFFICE...."CAT IN THE HAT" FAILS AT BOX OFFICE...."JOSEY & THE PUSSYCATS" FAILS AT BOX OFFICE...."FLINTSONES" FAILS AT BOX OFFICE....."VIVA: ROCK VEGAS" FAILS AT BOX OFFICE...."ROCKY & BULLWINKLE" FAILS AT BOX OFFICE...."HOWARD THE DUCK" FAILS AT BOX OFFICE....."PITCH BLACK" FAILS AT BOX OFFICE....."CHRONICLES OF RIDDICK" FAILS AT BOX OFFICE....."VIRUS" FAILS AT BOX OFFICE.....

WHEN UNIVERSAL STUDIOS CANCELLED ALL OF THE SCIENCE FICTION PROGRAMS ON "SCI-FI CHANNEL" AND REPLACED THEM WITH NON-SCIENCE FICTION PROGRAMMING, THEY NEGLECTED TO CHANGE THE NAME OF THE NETWORK TO SOMETHING MORE FITTING. "THE HORROR CHANNEL", "THE USA NETWORK FILM VAULT CHANNEL", "THE INFOMERCIAL NETWORK", "THE HORROR/ACTION CHANNEL", OR "THE COMMERCIAL BROADCAST NETWORK" WOULD HAVE BEEN MORE APPROPRIATE TITLES.

UNIVERSAL STUDIOS TRACK RECORD WITH FANTASY MOVIES ISN'T MUCH BETTER. UNIVERSAL STUDIOS USUALLY RUNS INTO PROBLEMS WHEN THEY TRY TO MAKE LIVE ACTION MOVIES BASED ON COMIC BOOK CHARACTERS. THE "HULK" BORED AUDIENCES TO DEATH BARELY 10 MINUTES INTO THE MOVIE.....TURNING "VAN HELSING" INTO A SUPERNATURAL "RAMBO" WAS TOO RIDICULOUS FOR WORDS....."CAT IN THE HAT" PROVED THAT 5 YEAR OLD KIDS WEREN'T READY FOR "SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE" HUMOR......"JOSEY AND THE PUSSYCATS" WAS NOTHING MORE THAN A "CHARLIE'S ANGELS" RETREAD BASED ON A 1970 CARTOON THAT NO ONE REMEMBERED......THE "FLINTSTONES" MOVIES PROVED THAT REBUILDING "BEDROCK" ON A STUDIO BACKLOT WASN'T ENOUGH TO DRAW IN THE FANS OF THE CARTOON.....SOME PROPERTIES SHOULD BE LEFT IN CARTOON FORM, WHICH "ROCKY & BULLWINKLE" PROVED......"HOWARD THE DUCK" WAS GEORGE LUCAS'S FIRST CAREER FLOP. HOW FITTING THAT LUCAS CHOSE UNIVERSAL STUDIOS FOR THAT MOMENTOUS OCCASION......"PITCH BLACK" WAS "PITCH DULL"....."CHRONICLES OF RIDDICK" DISAPPEARED FROM THEATERS FASTER THAN "FINAL FANTASY-THE SPIRITS WITHIN"......AND "VIRUS" PROVED THAT WHEN UNIVERSAL STUDIOS MADE A MOVIE FOR THE SUMMER OF 1999, NO ONE CAME AND WENT TO THE BEACH INSTEAD......

THE MANAGEMENT OF "UNIVERSAL STUDIOS/SCI-FI CHANNEL" IS AN OPENLY HOSTILE REGIME TOWARDS THE VIEWING PUBLIC, SCIENCE FICTION PROGRAMMING, AND THE "BATTLESTAR GALACTICA" COPYRIGHT. THE ENDLESS GRAVEYARD OF CANCELLED TELEVISION SHOWS ON "SCI-FI CHANNEL" AS WELL AS UNIVERSAL STUDIOS ENDLESS BOX OFFICE FAILURES INDICATES THAT THIS IS A CORPORATION THAT DELIBERATELY LOST ITS WAY IN MAKING RATIONAL BUSINESS DECISIONS. ONE CAN ALWAYS HOPE FOR MIRACLES, AND THE PERMANENT FINANCIAL DOWNFALL OF "UNIVERSAL STUDIOS/SCI-FI CHANNEL" IS A DREAM SHARED BY MANY.
+  languatron
|-+  Languatron's Fun Board - Your On-Line Demonstration Of Mind Over Matter: I Don't Mind, And Bonnie Hammer Doesn't Matter
| |-+  The Ronald D. Moore Criticism Section (Moderator: languatron)
| | |-+  Why Doesn't Ronald D. Moore Click With The Television Audience?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Why Doesn't Ronald D. Moore Click With The Television Audience?  (Read 38 times)
languatron
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 689


Life could be this beautiful without NBC-TV in it.


View Profile Email
Why Doesn't Ronald D. Moore Click With The Television Audience?
« on: November 15, 2004, 11:30:54 AM »

Maybe it's because Ronald D. Moore sees every writing assignment as his "Personal Ego Project." He spends so much time trying to convince everyone that he is a brilliant writer (HE ISN'T), that somewhere along the way he never learned how to simply entertain the television audience. It's ironic that what Ronald D. Moore thinks is brilliant writing, is actually dysfunctional boredom and cliched clap-trap. Edward James Olmos has spent every moment in Ron Moore's production, with a scowl on his face. We are supposed to like this character Olmos is playing? Why? What is there to like about him? The other cast members play characters humping each other, screwing each other psychologically, and not having one likeable characteristic. Where is the brilliant writing in all of this? This isn't brilliant writing. It's "Paint By The Numbers/Easy To Create/Negative Conflict" drama. Anybody could write this CRAP, because it's easy as hell to write negative conflict, than it is to write cheerful, happy drama. Just ask the writing staff of "7th Heaven." They'll tell you how hard it is.

So, in creating his "Negative Conflict/Ego Project", Ronald D. Moore has isolated himself from the healthy impulses of the television viewing audience. The audience that is instinctively drawn to happy, well adjusted, and loving characters on the tv screen. What little audience watches his crap, looks at his CRAP on the tv screen, instead of becoming involved in it. Watching a Ronald D. Moore production is an "Uninvolving Spectator Sport." You're looking into the Roman Colliseum, and hoping that every character you are repulsed by, DIES. Moore and his cast members have created characters THAT WE ALL HOPE, WILL DIE.

This isn't entertaining television. You can't make a character who is a SON OF A BITCH, a likeable character. No matter how hard you try as a writer or producer. The moment you create a cast of characters who immediately repulse the television audience, you are digging your own grave as a writer/producer. And the myth continues in Hollywood, that if you create a piece of SHIT that is populated with unlikeable characters, you are somehow a brilliant writer or producer for having created it. I have never understood this DERANGED line of thinking in Hollywood.

Ego projects in Hollywood have always had a short life span on this Earth. John Travolta's "Battlefield: Earth" played to empty movie theaters. Michael Cimino worked his way right out of the Hollywood profession forever when he went millions over budget and shot miles of useless film for "Heaven's Gate" in 1980. The scriptwriting in "M.A.S.H." went way down hill when Larry Gelbart left the series and someone made the FATAL MISTAKE of telling Alan Alda he was a comic genius. The consequences were, episode after episode of Alan Alda and Mike Farrel uttering ridiculous clapt-trap back and forth to one another in the midst of threadbare plots.

I don't believe anyone told Ronald D. Moore he was a scriptwriting genius. I do believe however, that somewhere along the way he began telling it to himself. It clouded his ability to function normally as a writer. To make the right decisions in devising formats and conceiving characters. No writer in his right mind would have conceived of the "Six" character, being so close to emulating "Seven of Nine." Quite frankly, I believe Moore ran into good old fashioned writers block when devising his mini series characters. His EGO took over, told him to RIP-OFF "Seven Of Nine", and then try to convince everyone that he didn't.

Ronald D. Moore is not a viewer friendly writer. Moore writes from his EGO. It's his "EGO'S Way Or The Highway." If the television audience doesn't like it, Moore tells the audience to take a hike. A rather bold and reckless stance from a "NOBODY FORMER STAR TREK STAFF WRITER" who has nothing to fall back on financially if his Sci-Fi Channel deal falls flat on its face. To this day, Ronald D. Moore remains a BIG NOBODY. One of those "FORMER STAR TREK STAFF WRITERS" who BORED THE AUDIENCE TO DEATH.
« Last Edit: November 15, 2004, 11:33:09 AM by languatron » Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to: